| |||||||||||||||||
| © This material is intended for individual research only. It may not otherwise be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying without the permission of the copyrightholder. | |||||||||||||||||
|
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to seek ways to understand mentally handicapped children as they are as unique individuals. The two dominant perspectives on special education, the traditional and the social perspectives, fall short of seeing mentally handicapped children "as they are" since they focus on either their differences from non-handicapped children or the commonality between handicapped and non-handicapped children. Thus the fundamental question of the research becomes how to see sameness and difference in order to understand the experience of mentally handicapped children in their lifeworlds. Lifeworlds of mentally handicapped children are explored in the form of "stories" based on my own experiences with these children, mainly because the form of story allows us to tell about particular events, particular experiences, and particular individuals in concrete situations. This epistemological concreteness of story is methodologically appropriate for the study, since as pedagogical research the study seeks to understand each child as a unique individual in his or her particular situation. The phenomenon of difference and the experience of each child are explored in the various stories through the topics "finger play," "eating," "smiling," "self-talk," "seeing and listening," and "don't touch me." An effort is also made throughout the stories to see sameness through difference so as not to over-emphasize either sameness or difference. In the endeavor of understanding experiences of mentally handicapped children by means of stories, it is suggested that intersubjectivity is a particularly meaningful dimension of children's experience. That is, experience becomes meaningful by being lived in a shared context. Intersubjectivity also suggests the reciprocal nature of understanding. These themes of contextuality of meaning and mutuality of understanding make all the more significant and responsible our place as teachers and parents in the lifeworlds of children. As to sameness and difference, it is proposed that what is needed is an understanding of the dialictic between individual difference and collective difference in order to understand mentally handicapped children as they are and to help them become themselves, to help them form their own identity. Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Formulating the Study Questions Introduction; Ted 1 Appropriateness of an Utterance 3 Rhea 5 Deviancy of Behavior 10 Particularity of Individuals and Particularity of Being Mentally Handicapped 12 Fred 13 Sameness and Difference 15 The Research Questions 16 Chapter 2 Review of Perspectives on Special Education (1) The Traditional Perspective on Special Education 18 (a) The Term "Traditional Perspective" 18 (b) Questions Concerning the Traditional Perspective 20 (2) The Social Perspective on Special Education 27 (a) Overview 27 (b) Questions Concerning the Social Perspective 31 (3) Summary (a) Need for Alternative Approach 35 (b) Possibility 37 Chapter 3 Methodology 42 (1) Acknowledging the Active Involvement of a Researcher 43 (2) Research Implication of the Pedagogical Stance 50 (3) Story as a Form of Researching 52 Chapter 4 Lifeworlds of Mentally Handicapped Children; Stories "Finger Play" 58 "Eating" 74 "Smiling" 90 "Self Talk" 107 "Seeing and Listening" 123 "Don't Touch Me" 137 Chapter 5 Reflections (1) Sameness and Difference 156 Dialectic of Sameness and Difference 158 Beyond Collective Difference 164 Difference, Self, and Identity 166 (2) Reflections Contextuality of Meaning 169 Continuous Nature of Hermeneutic and Pedagogical Inquiry 171 Notes 178 References 181 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
© Max van Manen, 2002 |
|||||||||||||||||